iRacing Bans Yuri Kasdorp, Shows Their Complicity With Genocide and Hate

"Yes I may be a zionist chud, but you were mean to ME and that's worse"

Share
A red with white and black Audi R8 LMS goes up Eau Rouge-Radillon in Rennsport.
screenshot from traxion.gg (from when Yuri Kasdorp raced with Mouz in Rennsport for ESL R1)

CW: This articles contains a link to a video and features screencaptures which feature transphobic and xenophobic rhetoric, as the conduct in that iRacing session was the main point of contention for the article.


Renowned road racer and driver coach in sim racing Yuri Kasdorp announced on his YouTube channel that he had been banned from racing on iRacing and using it's voice and text chat capabilities for "Hate Speech."

These bans, one week from racing and three months from voice and text chat, come after an altercation with an iRacing user that goes by Craig Townsend that took place after a race at Michelin Raceway Road Atlanta. After Craig had made transphobic comments in the text chat, claiming other people were "Nazi supporters" and denying that the rogue, Zionist state of Israel was committing a genocide against Palestinians which Yuri and others reported to iRacing, Craig would then go on a delusional, hate-fueled tirade in the all-teams voice chat. This interaction would start after Craig made an off the cuff comment about a video Yuri had posted showing his support and standing up for marginalized and at-risk people and communities, in which Craig would claim that Yuri was in support of "mental health illness." Yuri would then make comments in the iRacing text chat which included: "your country (Israel) is committing genocide be ashamed," and after Craig called trans people mutants,"Craig one day you realize you make the world a worse place."

After being given the ban, Yuri emailed iRacing Support and asked for clarification as to find out what comments prompted the bans, with those two messages being what were provided as examples. This was shared in a follow-up livestream from Yuri on September 25th. No information regarding any action by iRacing towards Craig Townsend has been made public by iRacing, or been verifiably shared by people who would have that information. Chief Official at iRacing Nim Cross made a comment on the official, private forum which implies action was taken against Craig for his transphobic, abusive, hateful comments but no public statement on the matter will be made.

Thank you for expressing your concerns.  The issues raised have been reviewed extensively, and any violations identified involving the drivers in question have been addressed appropriately. The suggestion that iRacing does nothing about intentional wrecking is simply not accurate. Intentional wrecking and other violations of the Sporting Code are investigated and addressed when the available evidence establishes a violation.  We also take allegations of discriminatory, xenophobic, or otherwise hateful conduct seriously. iRacing does not permit this type of behavior, and violations of our rules are addressed when they are established.  However, we do not discuss another member's account, protest history, or disciplinary action with third parties. This includes explaining why a particular member was suspended or providing details about the evidence or circumstances involved in an individual case. Those matters are between iRacing and the member involved.  For the same reason, we are not going to provide a public statement detailing the circumstances of Yuri's suspension. The fact that we do not publicly discuss an individual enforcement action should not be interpreted as meaning that no action was taken, there was.  We understand that some members would prefer public explanations regarding individual cases, but iRacing's responsibility is to enforce the rules and protect the integrity of the service and its membership, not to publicly disclose private account matters.  The community is welcome to raise concerns about the rules or their enforcement, but the absence of publicly disclosed disciplinary details should not be taken as evidence that a violation was ignored.

iRacing historically has not made the results of protests and stewarding decisions public; they have always played a true-neutral role beyond taking action and notifying the affected parties. This precedent was shattered after iRacing made a public comment shaming the conduct that took place by a bunch of kids during Split 22 of the Spa 24 Hours last year as a direct response to waves of influencers and media claiming that those kids griefing were effectively "destroying sim racing." As noted last year in my reflection on Split 22, iRacing never made comments after top level, fully funded esports operations cheated in premiere events, but an extreme case of griefing by kids in a race that doesn't matter forces them to instead? Will someone showing their support of the genocide of Palestianians and the genocide of trans people enough for iRacing to publicly show where they stand, and what does it say if they won't?

At the same time, protest and reports submitted to iRacing can have much or as little context as desired by the submitter, and without it needing to be truthful. These protests rarely take prior history between the involved parties into account, and can be implied that decisions made will be done so in a vacuum. As a result, Craig can make defamatory claims, and flat out lie, regarding what was said by Yuri that iRacing moderation won't be able to fully understand the full context of. Was Yuri Kasdorp accused of being antisemitic in the report, a common tactic by Zionists to falsely conflate supporting Palestine as being antisemitic? It must be said that there was no way it was noted that the "Craig one day you realize you make the world a worse place," comment was done in response to Craig Townsend being transphobic. And as it turns out, this was the case when the details of Craig's report and the nature of the bans was shared with Yuri as well.

screen capture from Yuri Kasdorp's stream replay

The reality of the situation was Yuri took a stand against the hate being put into the world by Craig, who has been clearly radicalized by the far-right and has a history of this conduct on the service, and the black and white, potentially exploitable nature of iRacing's internal protest protocol and their terms of service can't objectively do the right thing in such circumstances. It puts into question if the protocol put in place by iRacing for protests, and the people responsible for deciding judgement, can be trusted to do the right thing to deal with hate on the service. Craig Townsend abused the system, blatantly lied, and iRacing effectively sided with them regardless of him being genocide denier, transphobe, and being antisemitic for claiming someone supporting Palestine for being "anti-Jew," when Israel is a Zionist state that claims otherwise as an attempted gotcha. The clarification implies that action has been taken against Craig, but remains ill-equipped to deal with his repeated ban evasion and if anyone else does does similar conduct. And it remains unknown what would happen if anyone else stands up to such hate.


It is common for right-wing bad faith actors to jump at any opportunity to silence those who oppose them, often searching for anything that a moderation system can vaguely understand as going against terms of service, to then jump at the chance. It's a regular occurrence on Bluesky with trans users often getting suspended for standing up against bigots and transphobes on a service that was made successful by those very same trans users; and it's especially concerning when similar conduct happens to an ally period. It's speaks to services and moderation principals that are out of touch with reality; that fail to do what they are suppose to do and protect users, especially marginalized and at-risk members of their communities. In taking an ill-informed, and implied neutral position, the people running iRacing moderation got played by someone that's been fully radicalized by fascism and wants to ensure such hate and bigotry remains accepted on the service. By not taking a side in public, iRacing took a side regardless of any action taken against Craig Townsend in private. The appeal system and the way iRacing operates in this regard needs a massive overhaul to actually protect it's members and ensure it's safe for its most at-risk users as to not aid in the rise of fascism.

When a service like iRacing does something like this, it sets an ugly precedent. It sets a precedent that they don't care about what is actually happening in the real world to their users; that they don't care that trans people are at stage eight of the ten stages of genocide within the United States and the United Kingdom. When the virtual world is often a last safe haven for marginalized communities, the virtual world still needs to stand up for those who can't stand up for themselves. How are trans people suppose to feel safe and enjoy a hobby that we all share if the powers that be won't do the right thing and look out for them?


It is often seen when anybody brings up a sagely political opinion in public sim racing circles that people will come out of the woodwork to demand to "stop making sim racing political." The problem being is that politics doesn't stop when you get behind the wheel in the virtual world, and incredibly powerful politicians are politicizing the lives of innocent people trying to live as how they truly see themselves. They're being made targets of persecution and hate, often at the behest of incredibly rich people who want to distract the public from the real harm they are causing to the world. Those who bemoan others and accuse them of making sim racing "political" are saying in soft-language that they don't agree with their politics, and are saying that in regards to the rights of trans people and other marginalized communities as well as the Palestinian Genocide.

And in choosing to ban Yuri Kasdorp for standing up for marginalized communities, iRacing made a choice in saying that they don't care about protecting gender minorities on their service and that it's a safe haven to be a fascist and a zionist chud, a choice that they must reverse course on.

But kids throwing a temper tantrum in a race that doesn't matter? Yes that is a issue for the service in ways that fascism isn't.